← Back to Divisions
commons

That sort of process is a scandal, to be frank. We would not tolerate it in other public bodies, and I do not understand why we are allowing it to happen with TfL. The whole purpose of having the lists proposed in new clause 1 is to make sure that the information is genuinely public. At the moment, even some of the people living on these sites are unaware of TfL’s ambitions. They were certainly no...

📅 16 March 2015 #14490
Result
Ayes won
Majority of 176
AYES 192 16 NOES
92.3% aye share 176 majority
Ayes
192
Noes
16
Majority
176
Recorded votes
208

What this division was about

A plain-language summary of the division and its context.

No additional explanatory text is stored for this division yet.

Coding / classification

How this division is currently coded in your scoring system.
Progressive side
UNKNOWN
Confidence
0% · Low confidence

How MPs voted

Detailed MP-level vote records are not available for this division yet.